Re Kim’s thought - it’s presumptuous of me to comment further but I just thought he was arguing you needed to keep formal questions more open than their outline seems to provide - I mean questions of form as well as formal questions. That’s what your historian seems to be arguing too, if I take his drift.

This entry was posted on Monday, August 28th, 2006 at 9:39 am and is filed under Correspondence. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.